How do you learn to be an effective leader? Follow the 70-20-10 rule.

A research-based, time-tested guideline for developing managers says that you need to have 3 types of experience, using a 70-20-10 ratio: challenging assignments (70%), developmental relationships (20%), and coursework and training (10%).

The 70-20-10 rule emerged from 30 years of our research, which explores how executives learn, grow, and change over the course of their careers.

The underlying assumption is that leadership is learned. We believe that today, even more than before, a manager’s ability and willingness to learn from experience is the foundation for leading with impact.

The 70-20-10 rule seems simple, but you need to take it a step further.

All experiences aren’t created equal. Which experiences contribute the most to learning and growth? And what specific leadership lessons can be learned from each experience?

To help you (and your boss or direct reports) match your learning needs to the experiences most likely to provide that learning, we’ve researched and mapped out the links between experiences and lessons learned.

We recently completed a study that extended our long-standing findings (rooted in U.S.-based corporations) to a global audience. Our researchers collaborated with organizations in India, China, and Singapore to extend what we know about how leadership is learned.

70-20-10-learning-infographic

Key Findings

In China, India, Singapore, and the U.S., there are important similarities and differences in the way leadership is learned from experiences. But 5 universally important sources of leadership learning stand out from studies of these 4 countries:

  1. Bosses and superiors
  2. Turnarounds
  3. Increases in job scope
  4. Horizontal moves
  5. New initiatives

Additionally, each respective country draws from 2 unique primary sources of leadership:

  • China: personal experiences and mistakes
  • India: personal experiences and crossing cultures
  • Singapore: stakeholder engagements and crises
  • United States: mistakes and ethical dilemmas

Among the leadership lessons learned from experiences, 3 are ranked as universally important in all 4 countries: managing direct reports, self-awareness, and executing effectively.

To adapt and grow, leaders need to be constantly involved in new experiences and challenges that foster learning. Some of these new opportunities will come their way through new jobs, crises, or significant challenges. But it isn’t necessary to change jobs to find powerful learning experiences in the workplace. And in any job situation, leaders need to seek out or strengthen relationships with bosses, mentors, and peers that will contribute to their own growth in leadership.

We believe in putting experience at the center of talent management. It’s an approach that emphasizes the pivotal role of challenging assignments in attracting, developing, and retaining talent — and at the same time, highlights how the power of on-the-job experience is enhanced when surrounded by developmental relationships and formal learning opportunities.

In fact, our research shows that challenging assignments are the primary source of key learning experiences in managerial careers.

The Amplifier Effect

What about coursework and training? Although it’s seen as contributing just 10% to a leader’s development, well-designed coursework and training have an amplifier effect — clarifying, supporting, and boosting the other 90% of your learning. A program module that incorporates tools and experiential practice sessions can help managers become more effective learners and leaders. Skilled training specialists can help an organization establish a shared knowledge base and align its members with respect to a common leadership vision.

Learn about why our Leading for Organizational Impact is the ideal setting for functional leaders to gain the 10% of coursework and training they need.

24 thoughts on “The 70-20-10 Rule for Leadership Development

  1. Mark says:

    So – does the emperor have clothes? Certainly I’m not the only one, hopefully, to inquire: what’s the research supporting this? What was the focus group? The hypothesis? The methodology? The results and limitations and further research? My investigation of the research is there is little corroborating 70:20:10. My mind is open; if it exists I’d like to know.
    Cheers

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Start typing and press Enter to search