• Published November 16, 2020
  • 6 Minute Read
LEADING EFFECTIVELY ARTICLE

How to Evaluate the Impact of Leadership Development

How to Evaluate the Impact of Leadership Development

Every organization that invests in leadership development must conduct leadership evaluation and determine how the benefits stack up to the time and money invested.

Are you responsible for evaluating outcomes and communicating the findings to decision-makers and interested stakeholders alike? A practical framework for gathering and making sense of information will help you.

We have compiled our best, most hands-on learning about leadership evaluation in the second edition of Evaluating the Impact of Leadership Development.

Created for anyone who has leadership development or evaluation responsibilities, this short leadership evaluation how-to guide includes everything you need to organize, implement, and report on the impact of leadership development programs.

Why Evaluate the Impact of Leadership Development?

4 Lost Opportunities When You Don’t Conduct Leadership Evaluation

After the expense and effort of launching a leadership development program, evaluation may seem like an extra or unnecessary step. Yet without it, you’re missing many benefits and major learning opportunities of evaluation. Here are 4 opportunities you’ll miss unless you evaluate your process:

  • Understanding if the initiative achieved the intended goals.
  • Communicating results to the people responsible for outcomes.
  • Taking actions based on lessons learned through the leadership development process.
  • Making the case for continuing or ending the program.

Leadership evaluation is the framework for gathering and making sense of information to help you assess the success of leadership development efforts and make sound decisions about future investments. Each organization will have various reasons to evaluate their initiative — some will be more focused on how to improve a program while others are following conditions set by a funder. Many organizations choose to undergo an evaluation to ensure their leadership programs suit the cultural needs of the organization.

The 6 Stages of the Leadership Evaluation Cycle

Evaluating the Impact of Leadership Development book coverThe latest edition of Evaluating the Impact of Leadership Development combines a foundational approach to evaluate a program with examples of evaluation design processes and tools specific to leadership development, and is organized according to these 6 stages of the leadership evaluation cycle:

  1. Understanding the evaluation function and process.
  2. How to gather information, plan, and conceptualize the evaluation.
  3. Ways to identify and engage the people who care about your program.
  4. Easy steps for collecting and analyzing data.
  5. How to interpret and communicate evaluation findings.
  6. Best methods to implement changes and share lessons learned.

The Who, What, When of Top-Notch Leadership Evaluation Design

5 Questions to Ask

A hallmark of leadership evaluation is to provide observers, participants, and decision-makers with a sense of how well something is working, or not. A good evaluation design is based on a solid understanding of the expected outcomes of the program and an understanding of who cares about the program, and what their expectations are.

To achieve a good leadership evaluation design, you should ask 5 key questions:

1. Who are the people who care most about the evaluation findings?

The leadership evaluation will be most useful if it’s designed based on the expectations, concerns, and perceptions of key stakeholders. Stakeholders could be those who are involved directly — participants or the program staff — as well as organizational leaders and others who could invest in the initiative or are affected by it.

2. What changes do we expect from our program?

Evaluation design is based on knowing the connection between each program element and what it’s trying to achieve. What knowledge and skills is the program designed to develop? What actions or behaviors reflect those desired lessons learned? How will we know learning has occurred? What’s the definition of success? What degree of improvement is expected?

When these questions are answered by stakeholders early on, it can not only inform what you evaluate but also strengthen the program design. It can reveal details that had been overlooked as well as unnecessary elements or gaps in the program design.

3. What’s most critical to measure?

Narrowing the scope of what you evaluate to what’s most critical is the next step. If you breeze through this part of the process, it’s easy to end up collecting more information than you need or miss collecting data that ends up being of great interest to your stakeholders. Plus, you can avoid conflict down the road if you can simplify and summarize the evaluation so that stakeholders get another chance to buy in to what you’re doing.

As you think through the factors you want to measure, consider our simple framework for evaluating training outcomes. Our researchers developed this framework after decades of implementing and evaluating the success of leadership development programs.

First, understand the levels of impact a development program can have. These 4 levels range from the individual, to the group, to the entire organization, to all of society. Levels of impact are connected outcomes that ripple outward over time; by understanding these levels, you can clarify your expectations.

It’s important to note that not all leadership solutions are expected to exert their impact on all 4 levels; the expected impact on a given level will depend largely on the specific goals of each solution.

Next, consider 3 contributing factors, which include:

  • Leadership characteristics: Are participants prepared, and are they fully engaged?
  • Leadership solution: This is the content itself, the development’s design characteristics and the way in which it’s delivered.
  • Context: Does your organization’s culture and leadership support development?

Our research reveals that, as you consider what’s most critical to measure, it’s helpful to focus on the factors that can actually help to maximize the impact of your leadership development initiatives. That way, you ensure the design of the solution is relevant to the challenges faced by your leaders, is delivered in a way that engages leaders, and accounts for contextual factors.

4. How will we gather useful data?

Each data-collection method has a purpose. For example, behavioral change can be captured by a 360-degree assessment designed to measure change, while focus groups or interviews are a useful way to gain an in-depth understanding of the obstacles people face in implementing desired behavioral changes.

End-of-program leadership evaluation surveys measure immediate responses to the program, but they don’t reveal the results of individual development in the way that post-program surveys and interviews can. Social media, phone apps, pulse surveys, and self-monitoring technologies enable you to capture real-time and continuous feedback for participants, along with rich data on behaviors and their impact on business results.

5. What did we learn, and what do we do about it?

The whole reason you evaluate an initiative is to draw meaningful conclusions from data and use them to make informed choices. So it’s important to build in time and commitment to discussing evaluation results, as well as planning how to use them.

If you’ve identified the definition of success for those involved in the program and its future, you’ll be able to present defensible interpretations of the data and make valuable recommendations for how to improve and continue the program.

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Whether you’re a seasoned leadership evaluation professional or a first-timer, partner with our Leadership Analytics and Evaluation team and let our experts show you how to evaluate leadership development.

  • Published November 16, 2020
  • 6 Minute Read

Based on Research by

Tracy Patterson
Tracy Patterson
Former Portfolio Director & Faculty

Tracy has extensive experience in leading programs and initiatives in the government, nonprofit, and health sectors. During her time at CCL, Tracy directed and expanded our global evaluation function and served as a facilitator for leadership development, program design, and capacity-building programs with nonprofit organizations.

Sarah Stawiski
Sarah Stawiski
Director, Insights & Impact Group

With more than 15 years of experience conducting applied research and program evaluation, Sarah leads a team that uses data to improve programs and show evidence of impact with a goal of helping us advance our mission and achieve greater results. She has published multiple articles in peer-reviewed journals and contributed to several books on topics including evaluation of leadership development, generational differences in the workplace, shared group cognition, ethical decision making, and bias in the workplace.

Kelly Hannum
Kelly Hannum
Former Director, Global Research Insights

In addition to directing an international group conducting research about leadership and leadership development, Kelly co-authored our casebook on Leadership Across Differences, the guidebook Managing Your Whole Life, and the books Evaluating the Impact of Leadership Development and The Handbook of Leadership Development Evaluation.

Heather Champion
Heather Champion
Manager, Insights & Impact Services

Heather works with CCL staff, global clients, and external evaluators to design and conduct customized needs assessments (discovery) and evaluations for our programs, products, and services. This work includes identifying organizational and leadership needs, articulating program outcomes, selecting the most appropriate methods for evaluating initiatives for improvement and impact, and reporting the findings to and partnering with key stakeholders to discern actionable insights. She also serves as a subject matter expert for our Leadership Analytics services.

What to Explore Next

Leading Effectively Article
Measuring Impact of Leadership Development Investments: 6 Steps

How effective are your investments in leadership development? You'll be more successful at measuring the impact of your efforts if you build evaluation in from the beginning.

Leading Effectively Article
The Benefit of Evaluating Your Development Process

The importance of conducting training program evaluation for stakeholders, funders, and participants makes it an integral part of the development process. Learn 4 key benefits of training evaluation.

Leading Effectively Article
Focused on Improving Employee Engagement? Pay Attention to These 4 Factors

Strengthening these 4 areas of employee engagement — starting with the effectiveness of your frontline managers, your largest population of people leaders — makes a huge difference for retention.

Leading Effectively Article
Can People Analytics Revolutionize Your Organization?

People analytics are an incredible organizational tool. HR leaders can use their people data to help prioritize and target their investments in human capital and leadership development to maximize impact and ROI.

White Paper
Using Predictive Analytics for Leadership Development

When you use data and predictive analytics to set leadership development priorities, you make smarter, better-informed decisions about developing your people and your culture.

Related Solutions

About CCL

The Center for Creative Leadership (CCL)® is a top-ranked, global, nonprofit provider of leadership development and a pioneer in the field of global leadership research. We know from experience how transformative remarkable leaders really can be.

Over the past 50 years, we’ve worked with organizations of all sizes from around the world, including more than 2/3 of the Fortune 1000. Our hands-on development solutions are evidence-based and steeped in our work with hundreds of thousands of leaders at all levels.